If you’re building a direct-to-consumer (DTC) brand, one of the most important decisions you’ll make is how to fund your growth. The stakes are high: in 2024, US direct-to-consumer sales are projected to reach $213 billion, putting DTC brands at the center of ecommerce and retail innovation and making the right DTC funding model a real competitive advantage, not just a finance decision.
Two of the most common DTC funding options are revenue-based financing (RBF) and equity funding. Equity funding means selling a portion of your company in exchange for capital, which can accelerate growth but dilutes your ownership and control. Revenue-based financing, by contrast, is a non-dilutive capital option where repayments are tied to a percentage of your monthly revenue, flexing with your sales instead of locking you into fixed repayments.
This article breaks down the nuances of revenue-based financing vs equity funding for DTC brands so you can decide which funding model best supports your growth plan, risk appetite, and vision for your brand.
Revenue-Based Financing for DTC E-Commerce
Revenue-Based Financing for DTC e-commerce provides a flexible alternative to traditional loans or equity-based investments. It provides flexible cash without sacrificing equity, while traditional equity offers strategic support and large funding. The right choice depends on your growth speed, risk tolerance, and control priorities.
This approach allows companies to secure capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue. Repayment aligns with business performance, not a fixed schedule.
A non-dilutive funding model means you do not give up ownership or equity in your business when receiving capital.
RBF allows DTC brands to repay only when earning revenue.
- Evaluate your cash flow volatility
- Clarify your ownership goals
- Determine your capital needs
- Assess your risk tolerance before choosing equity or RBF
Example: An organic skincare DTC brand used revenue-based financing to fund a seasonal inventory build, repaying as sales increased, while another brand secured equity for a full product line expansion.
Why RBF Matters for E-Commerce
E-commerce businesses often face unique challenges, such as fluctuating cash flows and the need for rapid scaling. RBF addresses these hurdles by providing funding that grows with the business. Unlike conventional loans, which require fixed monthly payments regardless of revenue, RBF repayments adjust dynamically. Payments depend on income levels each month. This flexibility is particularly advantageous for e-commerce ventures that experience seasonal sales spikes or rely on subscription-based models—a trend that has seen significant growth in recent years.
Key Features of Revenue-Based Financing
- Performance-Based Repayment: Payments are tied to a percentage of monthly revenue, ensuring businesses are not overburdened during slower periods.
- No Equity Dilution: Unlike venture capital, RBF does not require founders to give up ownership stakes, preserving control over the business.
- Quick Access to Funds: Approval processes are often faster than traditional loans, making RBF ideal for businesses needing immediate capital to seize growth opportunities.
Advantages of RBF for E-Commerce
The benefits of RBF extend beyond flexibility:
- Scalability: As repayments are proportional to revenue, businesses can scale without the pressure of fixed debt obligations.
- Predictable Costs: The absence of interest rates or hidden fees simplifies financial planning.
- Alignment of Interests: RBF providers are incentivized to support the business’s growth, as their returns depend on its success.
Sustainability and Market Growth

According to Allied Market Research, the global revenue-based financing market was valued at $901.41 million in 2019 and is expected to reach approximately $42.3 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of about 61.8% from 2020 to 2027.This explosive growth reflects the increasing adoption of RBF by e-commerce businesses worldwide. Providers like Clearco and Uncapped have played pivotal roles in shaping the market, offering tailored solutions for online retailers.
Risks and Considerations
While RBF offers numerous advantages, it’s not without risks. Businesses must carefully evaluate the percentage of revenue they commit to repayments, as overly aggressive terms can strain cash flow during slower months. Additionally, transparency in contract terms is crucial to avoid unexpected fees or obligations. Negotiating favorable terms requires a clear understanding of the business’s revenue patterns and growth projections.
Prominent Providers in the RBF Space
Several providers have established themselves as leaders in the RBF market:
- Clearco: Known for its data-driven approach, Clearco offers funding solutions tailored to e-commerce businesses.
- Uncapped: This provider has pivoted to focus on flexible financing options for online retailers, emphasizing speed and simplicity.
- Amazon FBA and Shopify Integration: Many RBF providers offer tools that integrate seamlessly with platforms like Amazon FBA and Shopify, streamlining the funding process for e-commerce entrepreneurs.
For businesses exploring alternative financing options, venture debt ecommerce startups can complement or compete with RBF.
Revenue-based financing continues to evolve, offering e-commerce businesses a sustainable and scalable way to access capital. By understanding its features, advantages, and risks, entrepreneurs can make informed decisions that align with their growth objectives.
Usage of Revenue-Based Financing Funds
E-commerce brands often turn to Revenue-Based Financing to fuel immediate growth initiatives.
Key Areas of Fund Utilization
Inventory Management
Maintaining adequate inventory levels is crucial for e-commerce businesses to meet customer demand without delays. RBF funds allow brands to replenish stock efficiently, avoiding missed sales opportunities and ensuring smooth operations during peak seasons.Advertising Campaigns
Strategic advertising is another common use of RBF funds. Brands invest in targeted digital campaigns across platforms like Google Ads and social media to drive traffic and boost conversions. By focusing on high-performing channels, businesses can maximize their return on investment and accelerate revenue growth.Product Development
Innovation plays a vital role in staying competitive. Many e-commerce brands use RBF funds to enhance existing products or develop new ones that cater to evolving customer preferences. This approach not only increases sales potential but also strengthens brand loyalty over time.
Matching Funding Type to Investment Payback Period
Building on the importance of aligning fund usage with revenue goals, founders should match funding type to the investment payback period. Short-term needs, such as inventory or marketing, are best served by Revenue-Based Financing or working capital loans, minimizing dilution and repayment risk. Long-term growth investments, like product development or market expansion, may justify equity funding despite ownership dilution. This approach helps maintain cash flow stability and control while supporting sustainable business growth.
Aligning Fund Usage with Revenue Goals
The success of RBF lies in its alignment with revenue-generating activities. By prioritizing initiatives that directly impact sales, e-commerce brands can ensure a steady cash flow to repay the financing quickly. This strategy also minimizes financial strain, allowing businesses to focus on sustainable growth.
Comparing RBF, Equity, and Asset-Based Lending
Equity Funding for DTC E-Commerce
Equity funding for DTC e-commerce means selling a portion of your company in exchange for capital. Instead of repaying from monthly revenue, investors get upside when the business grows in value, through future dividends, secondary sales, or an exit (acquisition or IPO).
For DTC brands, equity is usually used to build things that don’t pay back immediately but create big long-term value: a stronger brand, new product lines, retail expansion, and a team that can execute at scale.
While RBF is designed to flex with short-term sales, equity is designed to back long-term bets in your brand and category.
Why Equity Matters for E-Commerce and Retail Growth
DTC brands rarely stay purely online forever. As you expand into marketplaces, retail, and international markets, you need capital that can support bigger, slower-payback moves.
Equity becomes important when you want to:
- Enter or scale offline retail (wholesale, pop-ups, own stores)
- Build a defensible brand that can outspend competitors on awareness
- Invest heavily in product innovation and category expansion
- Build a senior leadership team and internal capabilities (data, logistics, tech)
These moves often don’t pay back in a few months. They may take years, but if they work, they can meaningfully increase the value of your company. That’s exactly what equity capital is designed to support.
Key Features of Equity Funding
- Ownership Dilution
You give up a percentage of your company in exchange for capital. Investors own shares and participate in future upside. - No Fixed Repayments
There are no monthly installments tied to revenue. Instead, investors get their returns through future liquidity events (dividends, buybacks, M&A, IPO). - Strategic Support
Equity investors often bring more than money: retail connections, hiring support, fundraising help, and guidance on scaling operations. - Longer Time Horizon
Equity capital is typically patient. Investors expect returns over several years, not months. This suits brand-building and large strategic bets.
Advantages of Equity for DTC and Omnichannel Retail
Equity is particularly powerful when your brand is shifting from “profitable channel operation” to “large, defensible consumer brand.”
Key advantages:
- Supports Big, Long-Term Moves
Launching new categories, entering multiple retail chains, or expanding geographically can strain cash flow. Equity lets you invest ahead of revenue without being crushed by repayments. - De-Risks Aggressive Growth
When you’re making bold moves, like doubling ad spend or opening multiple stores, equity cushions you from short-term dips or slower payback periods. - Access to Networks and Expertise
The right equity investors can open doors to retail buyers, top-tier agencies, experienced operators, and even future acquisition partners. - Helps Build a Strong Team
Equity rounds often go hand-in-hand with hiring senior leaders, building in-house creative, data, and supply chain teams, things that unlock scale but are expensive upfront.
Types of Equity Investors for DTC Brands
There are different flavors of equity partners for DTC and retail brands:
- Angel Investors
Early believers, often founders, operators, or high-net-worth individuals. They’re flexible and can be very founder-friendly in the early days. - Venture Capital (VC)
Optimized for fast growth, big markets, and large outcomes. VCs often support you through multiple rounds as you scale across channels and geographies. - Growth Equity / Consumer Funds
Focus on brands with traction and strong unit economics that want to scale up, especially into wholesale, retail, and international expansion. - Strategic / Corporate Investors
Larger retailers, FMCG companies, or category leaders investing for strategic alignment, istribution deals, co-branded products, or eventual acquisition paths.
Usage of Equity Funds
Equity is typically used for big, slow-payback initiatives that fundamentally change the size and value of the business.
Key Areas of Fund Utilization
1. Brand and Marketing Infrastructure
- Large top-of-funnel campaigns (TV, OOH, influencers at scale)
- Brand platform work (positioning, creative platforms, agencies)
- Community, content, and long-term storytelling that doesn’t always convert immediately
2. Product and Category Expansion
- Launching entirely new product lines or adjacent categories
- R&D and testing for new formulations, materials, or formats
- Building a product pipeline that supports multi-year growth, not just a seasonal bump
3. Retail and Omnichannel Expansion
- Listing fees, trade marketing, and promotions with large retailers
- In-store fixtures, merchandising, and demo staff
- Building wholesale teams and account management
4. Team and Operations
- Hiring senior leadership (CMO, COO, Head of Retail, Head of Data)
- Building in-house capabilities: creative, analytics, supply chain, CX
- Investing in systems: ERP, inventory management, data infrastructure
5. International Expansion
- Localizing products and packaging
- Setting up local logistics, warehousing, and returns
- Building regional marketing and partnerships
These investments often have a 2–5+ year payback horizon, making them more suitable for equity than for short-term repayment instruments like RBF.
RBF vs. Equity Funding
One of the standout advantages of RBF is its flexibility. Unlike equity funding, which involves giving up ownership and waiting indefinitely for returns, RBF provides a clear repayment framework without diluting control. Businesses retain full ownership while repaying the capital over time, making it an attractive option for those seeking growth without sacrificing equity.
| Feature | Revenue-Based Financing (RBF) | Equity Financing |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership & Control | No dilution; founders keep full ownership and control. | Dilution occurs; investors receive shares and may gain influence. |
| Repayment Structure | Repay as a fixed percentage of monthly revenue until a set cap is reached. | No repayments; investors receive returns through growth or exit events. |
| Cash Flow Impact | Repayments adjust with revenue, easing strain during slow periods. | No direct repayments; future profits are shared with investors. |
| Funding Amount | Typically lower; best for short to medium-term needs. | Can be larger; suitable for ambitious expansion and R&D. |
| Speed & Process | Faster approval, less intensive due diligence. | Longer process, requires pitching and negotiation. |
| Cost of Capital | Can be higher if revenue grows rapidly due to repayment cap multipliers. | No set repayment, but dilution means sharing future value. |
| Risk to Personal Assets | No personal guarantees or collateral required. | No personal guarantees, but risk of losing control with large dilution. |
| Flexibility | Highly flexible; repayments adjust to business performance. | Less flexible; investor expectations can influence decisions. |
| Investor Involvement | Minimal; rarely provide strategic guidance or board seats. | Often high; may offer mentorship, connections, and strategic input. |
| Best For | DTC brands with steady or seasonal revenue needing quick, non-dilutive cash. | Startups seeking large capital and strategic partners for rapid growth. |
Understanding The Difference Between RBF and Equity Through Practical Example
Cecil & Lou, a DTC e-commerce brand specializing in apparel auctions and in-stock sales, leveraged revenue-based financing (RBF) from Clearco to shift its business model and boost growth without equity dilution. In contrast, Airbnb, an early DTC platform in travel accommodations, used multiple equity rounds to fuel global expansion, accepting ownership dilution for substantial capital and strategic support. These examples highlight RBF's flexibility for revenue-tied repayments versus equity's scale for aggressive market capture.
Cecil & Lou: RBF Success
Cecil & Lou transitioned from primarily auction-style sales to in-stock inventory, with Clearco funding enabling 60% of Q1 2024 revenue from financed stock. This non-dilutive capital allowed instant profitability on inventory without debt carryover, as repayments aligned with sales realization. RBF proved ideal for DTC brands facing cash flow gaps in inventory scaling, preserving founder control amid seasonal fluctuations.
Airbnb: Equity-Driven Growth
Airbnb raised seed equity to launch operations, followed by Series B ($112M) and Series C ($475M) rounds that diluted founder stakes but increased overall company value through global reach. Equity provided patient capital for product development and hiring without repayment pressure, suiting high-growth DTC platforms needing investor networks. However, repeated dilutions shifted control dynamics, contrasting RBF's ownership retention.
Revenue-Based Financing vs Equity Financing in Practice
| Aspect | Revenue-Based Financing (Cecil & Lou) | Equity Financing (Airbnb) |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership Impact | None; full control retained | Dilution across rounds; investor influence grows |
| Repayment | % of revenue until cap; flexible with sales | None; returns via exits or growth |
| Use Case Fit | Inventory, marketing for DTC cash flow | Global expansion, talent for platforms |
| Speed & Cost | Fast approval, performance-aligned | Slower process, high long-term cost via equity |
For DTC founders, understanding these trade-offs is crucial to balancing cash flow, control, and long-term brand value. Within broader ecommerce startup fundraising strategies, RBF and equity funding sit at two very different ends of the spectrum, one focused on flexible, revenue-linked payback, the other on ownership and long-term upside.
Conclusion
Choosing the right funding strategy is pivotal for DTC growth. Revenue-Based Financing offers flexibility with repayments tied to earnings.
Understanding repayment structures, associated risks, and the implications for growth is essential before committing to any funding model. Each approach has unique advantages, and aligning them with your business goals ensures sustainable expansion.
If you’re looking to turn partnerships and marketplaces into real growth capital, at Qubit we understand co-marketing levers, take-rate math, and platform dynamics. Turn collaboration into checks with our ecommerce fundraising assistance and download our DTC funding comparison worksheet or schedule a free strategy call for personalized advice.
Key Takeaways
- RBF offers non-dilutive capital that aligns repayments with revenue performance.
- It provides fast access to funds to support growth initiatives like inventory and advertising.
- The model minimizes dilution, allowing founders to retain equity.
- Understanding repayment terms and risks is crucial for sustainable growth.
- Due diligence in comparing RBF with equity funding can lead to more informed financial decisions.
Frequently asked Questions
How is revenue-based financing different from equity funding for DTC brands?
Revenue-based financing lets DTC brands access capital without giving up ownership, while equity funding involves selling company shares. RBF ties repayments to business revenue.
